Participants
-
Mikael Nilsson
-
Pete Johnston
-
Andy Powell
Agenda
-
consensus on the non-problematic elements
-
some progress on the remaining elements
-
ideas for the structure of a document.
-
division of labour:
-
Main table (essentially the table on the wiki)
-
Examples, in DCAM format and possibly another syntax too
-
Definitions of properties and classes, including ranges etc.
-
LOM WG status update (no progress)
-
Kill RDF binding
-
Formal approval
-
Study group
-
PAR
Conclusions:
-
Example of what vocabularies will look like:
lom:LowDifficulty (vocabulary term)
-> rdf:type -> LOMv1.0Difficulty (VES)
-> rdfs:subClassOf -> lom:Difficulty (range of lom:difficulty)
-
The same for Relation.Kind terms? Means adding an additional type to dcterms:hasPart etc. in the LOM schemas. Probably ok.
-
One namespace or several? One for properties / another for vocabularies probably a good idea. Means putting Relation.Kind terms in the vocabulary namespace, which is probably ok. Also means that we show an example of how to construct a vocabulary.
-
Educational category: not repeatable.
-
Taxon paths are not supported
-
VCards - use VCard string as value string, open up for other properties as related descriptions. Refer to FOAF and W3C vCard.
-
DateTime and Duration - use value strings for both dates and descriptions.
-
Classification & Annotation: Value strings or not? Not for now.
-
4.1 Format SES? Postpone until DCMI decides.
-
Contribute & Classification: not the DC model, needs to be pointed out.
Who does what?
-
Mikael integrates tables into IEEE document format.
-
Pete looks at formats for examples.
-
Andy looks for actual examples and begins looking at the schemas.
-- ![[Self]](/wiki/dcmi/img/moin-inter.png){kind=small}
MikaelNilsson - 22 Dec 2005