= Participants =
   * Mikael Nilsson
   * Pete Johnston
   * Andy Powell

= Agenda =

   1. consensus on the non-problematic elements
   2. some progress on the remaining elements
   3. ideas for the structure of a document.
   4. division of labour:
      * Main table (essentially the table on the wiki)
      * Examples, in DCAM format and possibly another syntax too
      * Definitions of properties and classes, including ranges etc.
   5. LOM WG status update (no progress)
      * Kill RDF binding
      * Formal approval
      * Study group
      * PAR

= Conclusions: =
   * Example of what vocabularies will look like:
{{{
lom:LowDifficulty (vocabulary term)
   -> rdf:type -> LOMv1.0Difficulty (VES)
         -> rdfs:subClassOf -> lom:Difficulty (range of lom:difficulty)
}}}
   * The same for Relation.Kind terms? Means adding an additional type to dcterms:hasPart etc. in the LOM schemas. Probably ok.
   * One namespace or several? One for properties / another for vocabularies probably a good idea. Means putting Relation.Kind terms in the vocabulary namespace, which is probably ok. Also means that we show an example of how to construct a vocabulary.
   * Educational category: not repeatable.
   * Taxon paths are not supported
   * VCards - use VCard string as value string, open up for other properties as related descriptions. Refer to FOAF and W3C vCard.
   * DateTime and Duration - use value strings for both dates and descriptions.
   * Classification & Annotation: Value strings or not? Not for now.
   * 4.1 Format SES? Postpone until DCMI decides.
   * Contribute & Classification: not the DC model, needs to be pointed out.

= Who does what? =

   * Mikael integrates tables into IEEE document format.
   * Pete looks at formats for examples.
   * Andy looks for actual examples and begins looking at the schemas.


-- Self:MikaelNilsson - 22 Dec 2005