|
| Proposed Qualifiers: Date (2000-04-01) |
Result
Result of the Vote "Proposed Qualifiers: Date (2000-04-01)", generated at 4/15/00 7:00 PM.Number of votes cast: 24
1. Question: Qualifier for 'Date': Created
| Label: | Created | |
| Name: | created | |
| Definition: | Date of creation of the resource. | |
| Type: | Element Refinement |
type: single selection
| Answer | Points | |
| Approve | 24 | |
| Reject | 0 |
Abstain: 0
Choice with highest score: Approve
| Voter | Vote | Voter's comment |
| Simon Cox | Approve | |
| Renato Iannella | Approve | |
| Jon Mason | Approve | |
| David Bearman | Approve | |
| Leif Andresen | Approve | |
| Priscilla Caplan | Approve | |
| Traugott Koch | Approve | |
| Juha Hakala | Approve | |
| Diane Hillmann | Approve | |
| Stuart Weibel | Approve | |
| Andy Powell | Approve | |
| Makx Dekkers | Approve | |
| Roland Schwaenzl | Approve | |
| Tom Baker | Approve | |
| Rebecca Guenther | Approve | |
| Eric Childress | Approve | |
| Stuart Sutton | Approve | |
| Sigfrid Lundberg | Approve | |
| Warwick Cathro | Approve | |
| Erik Jul | Approve | |
| Rachel Heery | Approve | |
| Diann Rusch-Feja | Approve | |
| eric miller | Approve | |
| Shigeo Sugimoto | Approve |
2. Question: Qualifier for 'Date': Valid
| Label: | Valid | |
| Name: | valid | |
| Definition: | Date (often a range) of validity of a resource. | |
| Type: | Element Refinement |
type: single selection
| Answer | Points | |
| Approve | 22 | |
| Reject | 2 |
Abstain: 0
Choice with highest score: Approve
| Voter | Vote | Voter's comment |
| Simon Cox | Approve | |
| Renato Iannella | Approve | |
| Jon Mason | Approve | |
| David Bearman | Approve | |
| Leif Andresen | Approve | |
| Priscilla Caplan | Approve | |
| Traugott Koch | Approve | |
| Juha Hakala | Approve | |
| Diane Hillmann | Approve | |
| Stuart Weibel | Approve | |
| Andy Powell | Approve | |
| Makx Dekkers | Approve | |
| Roland Schwaenzl | Approve | |
| Tom Baker | Approve | |
| Rebecca Guenther | Reject | This is a special purpose date not for general application. I can see its use but only for a small number of types of resources; the only example anyone can give is train/bus schedules. It needs to also be made clear that this is the validity of the information content of the resource. |
| Eric Childress | Approve | |
| Stuart Sutton | Approve | |
| Sigfrid Lundberg | Approve | |
| Warwick Cathro | Approve | This is useful for materials which cease to be valid after they are superseded for legal reasons, but are still available for access and consultation. e.g. tax rulings, standards and regulations. |
| Erik Jul | Approve | |
| Rachel Heery | Reject | I think this is unlikely to be of 'widespread use'. This is one of our criteria for recommendation as outlined in the principles |
| Diann Rusch-Feja | Approve | |
| eric miller | Approve | |
| Shigeo Sugimoto | Approve |
3. Question: Qualifier for 'Date': Available
| Label: | Available | |
| Name: | available | |
| Definition: | Date (often a range) that the resource will become or did become available. | |
| Type: | Element Refinement |
type: single selection
| Answer | Points | |
| Approve | 22 | |
| Reject | 2 |
Abstain: 0
Choice with highest score: Approve
| Voter | Vote | Voter's comment |
| Simon Cox | Approve | |
| Renato Iannella | Approve | |
| Jon Mason | Approve | |
| David Bearman | Approve | |
| Leif Andresen | Approve | |
| Priscilla Caplan | Approve | |
| Traugott Koch | Approve | |
| Juha Hakala | Approve | |
| Diane Hillmann | Approve | |
| Stuart Weibel | Approve | |
| Andy Powell | Approve | |
| Makx Dekkers | Approve | |
| Roland Schwaenzl | Approve | |
| Tom Baker | Approve | |
| Rebecca Guenther | Reject | This is a special purpose date mainly for events, not one for general applications. There is also confusion between date available and date issued, since an issued date is essentially a publication date and a publisher is defined as one who makes the resource available. So what then is available date? |
| Eric Childress | Approve | |
| Stuart Sutton | Approve | |
| Sigfrid Lundberg | Approve | |
| Warwick Cathro | Approve | Shouldn't this only be for intended issue dates? Isn't it "issued" after it has become available? |
| Erik Jul | Approve | Logically, this definition should read "Date (often a range) that the resource is, will be, or was available. Also, since a range of dates is possible, "becoming" available is not the crucial point since "becoming available" represents a point in time, not a range of time. |
| Rachel Heery | Reject | see 2 |
| Diann Rusch-Feja | Approve | |
| eric miller | Approve | |
| Shigeo Sugimoto | Approve |
4. Question: Qualifier for 'Date': Issued
| Label: | Issued | |
| Name: | issued | |
| Definition: | Date of formal issuance (e.g., publication) of the resource. | |
| Type: | Element Refinement |
type: single selection
| Answer | Points | |
| Approve | 22 | |
| Reject | 2 |
Abstain: 0
Choice with highest score: Approve
| Voter | Vote | Voter's comment |
| Simon Cox | Reject | |
| Renato Iannella | Approve | |
| Jon Mason | Approve | |
| David Bearman | Approve | |
| Leif Andresen | Approve | |
| Priscilla Caplan | Approve | |
| Traugott Koch | Approve | |
| Juha Hakala | Approve | |
| Diane Hillmann | Approve | |
| Stuart Weibel | Approve | |
| Andy Powell | Approve | |
| Makx Dekkers | Approve | |
| Roland Schwaenzl | Approve | |
| Tom Baker | Approve | |
| Rebecca Guenther | Approve | |
| Eric Childress | Approve | |
| Stuart Sutton | Approve | |
| Sigfrid Lundberg | Approve | |
| Warwick Cathro | Approve | |
| Erik Jul | Approve | |
| Rachel Heery | Reject | Unlikely to be distinguishable from date created except for specialised cases |
| Diann Rusch-Feja | Approve | |
| eric miller | Approve | |
| Shigeo Sugimoto | Approve |
5. Question: Qualifier for 'Date': Modified
| Label: | Modified | |
| Name: | modified | |
| Definition: | Date on which the resource was changed. | |
| Type: | Element Refinement |
type: single selection
| Answer | Points | |
| Approve | 24 | |
| Reject | 0 |
Abstain: 0
Choice with highest score: Approve
| Voter | Vote | Voter's comment |
| Simon Cox | Approve | |
| Renato Iannella | Approve | |
| Jon Mason | Approve | |
| David Bearman | Approve | |
| Leif Andresen | Approve | |
| Priscilla Caplan | Approve | |
| Traugott Koch | Approve | |
| Juha Hakala | Approve | |
| Diane Hillmann | Approve | |
| Stuart Weibel | Approve | |
| Andy Powell | Approve | |
| Makx Dekkers | Approve | |
| Roland Schwaenzl | Approve | |
| Tom Baker | Approve | |
| Rebecca Guenther | Approve | Needs clarification as to how it relates to issued date. If the resource is modified and then issued (made available), when is it considered a enw resource and the issued date changed as opposed to adding a modification date? This seems to depend on the domain in which it's used. |
| Eric Childress | Approve | |
| Stuart Sutton | Approve | |
| Sigfrid Lundberg | Approve | |
| Warwick Cathro | Approve | |
| Erik Jul | Approve | |
| Rachel Heery | Approve | |
| Diann Rusch-Feja | Approve | |
| eric miller | Approve | |
| Shigeo Sugimoto | Approve |
6. Question: Encoding Scheme for 'Date': DCMI Period
| Label: | DCMI Period | |
| Name: | Period | |
| Definition: | A specification of the limits of a time interval. | |
| Type: | Encoding Scheme | |
| See also: | http://www.agcrc.csiro.au/projects/3018CO/metadata/dcperiod/ |
type: single selection
| Answer | Points | |
| Approve | 22 | |
| Reject | 1 |
Abstain: 1
Choice with highest score: Approve
| Voter | Vote | Voter's comment |
| Simon Cox | Approve | |
| Renato Iannella | Approve | |
| Jon Mason | Approve | |
| David Bearman | Approve | |
| Leif Andresen | Approve | |
| Priscilla Caplan | Approve | |
| Traugott Koch | Approve | |
| Juha Hakala | Approve | |
| Diane Hillmann | Approve | |
| Stuart Weibel | Approve | |
| Andy Powell | Approve | |
| Makx Dekkers | Approve | |
| Roland Schwaenzl | abstain | competes with MATHML intervals |
| Tom Baker | Approve | |
| Rebecca Guenther | Approve | |
| Eric Childress | Approve | |
| Stuart Sutton | Approve | |
| Sigfrid Lundberg | Approve | |
| Warwick Cathro | Approve | |
| Erik Jul | Approve | |
| Rachel Heery | Reject | |
| Diann Rusch-Feja | Approve | |
| eric miller | Approve | |
| Shigeo Sugimoto | Approve |
7. Question: Encoding Scheme for the 'Date': ;W3C-DTF
| Label: | W3C-DTF | |
| Name: | W3CDTF | |
| Definition: | W3C Encoding rules for dates and times - a profile based on ISO8601 | |
| Type: | Encoding Scheme | |
| See also: | http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime |
type: single selection
| Answer | Points | |
| Approve | 24 | |
| Reject | 0 |
Abstain: 0
Choice with highest score: Approve
| Voter | Vote | Voter's comment |
| Simon Cox | Approve | |
| Renato Iannella | Approve | |
| Jon Mason | Approve | |
| David Bearman | Approve | |
| Leif Andresen | Approve | |
| Priscilla Caplan | Approve | |
| Traugott Koch | Approve | |
| Juha Hakala | Approve | |
| Diane Hillmann | Approve | |
| Stuart Weibel | Approve | |
| Andy Powell | Approve | |
| Makx Dekkers | Approve | |
| Roland Schwaenzl | Approve | |
| Tom Baker | Approve | |
| Rebecca Guenther | Approve | Please clarify that the hyphens between year, month, day are optional, since ISO8601 allows for both expressions. If that is not correct, I'll change my vote. |
| Eric Childress | Approve | Note: hyphens are required under this scheme. W3C-DTF is a profile of ISO8601 and has defined a subset of practice allowed by ISO8601. |
| Stuart Sutton | Approve | |
| Sigfrid Lundberg | Approve | |
| Warwick Cathro | Approve | |
| Erik Jul | Approve | |
| Rachel Heery | Approve | |
| Diann Rusch-Feja | Approve | |
| eric miller | Approve | |
| Shigeo Sugimoto | Approve |
Contact András Micsik if you have problems with voting.
| © MTA SZTAKI DSD |