|
| Proposed Qualifiers: Relation (2000-04-01) |
Result
Result of the Vote "Proposed Qualifiers: Relation (2000-04-01)", generated at 4/15/00 7:00 PM.Number of votes cast: 24
1. Question: Qualifier for 'Relation': Is Version Of
| Label: | Is Version Of | |
| Name: | isVersionOf | |
| Definition: | The described resource is a version, edition, or adaptation of the referenced resource. | |
| Type: | Element Refinement |
type: single selection
| Answer | Points | |
| Approve | 24 | |
| Reject | 0 |
Abstain: 0
Choice with highest score: Approve
| Voter | Vote | Voter's comment |
| Simon Cox | Approve | |
| Renato Iannella | Approve | |
| Jon Mason | Approve | |
| David Bearman | Approve | |
| Priscilla Caplan | Approve | |
| Traugott Koch | Approve | |
| Juha Hakala | Approve | |
| Diane Hillmann | Approve | |
| Stuart Weibel | Approve | |
| Andy Powell | Approve | |
| Makx Dekkers | Approve | |
| Leif Andresen | Approve | |
| Roland Schwaenzl | Approve | |
| Tom Baker | Approve | |
| Rebecca Guenther | Approve | Approve the qualifier, but the definition is not useful. It needs to specify that this is a difference in intellectual content to distinguish it from IsFormatOf. I'm voting yes contingent on a change to the definition. |
| Eric Childress | Approve | |
| Stuart Sutton | Approve | |
| Sigfrid Lundberg | Approve | |
| Erik Jul | Approve | |
| Rachel Heery | Approve | |
| Warwick Cathro | Approve | I agree with Rebecca's comment. The Working Group should be asked to consider this, and perhaps the IFLA Functional Requirements document, in reviewing the definition. |
| Diann Rusch-Feja | Approve | |
| eric miller | Approve | |
| Shigeo Sugimoto | Approve |
2. Question: Qualifier for 'Relation': Replaces
| Label: | Replaces | |
| Name: | replaces | |
| Definition: | The described resource supplants, displaces, or supersedes the referenced resource. | |
| Type: | Element Refinement |
type: single selection
| Answer | Points | |
| Approve | 24 | |
| Reject | 0 |
Abstain: 0
Choice with highest score: Approve
| Voter | Vote | Voter's comment |
| Simon Cox | Approve | |
| Renato Iannella | Approve | |
| Jon Mason | Approve | |
| David Bearman | Approve | |
| Priscilla Caplan | Approve | |
| Traugott Koch | Approve | |
| Juha Hakala | Approve | |
| Diane Hillmann | Approve | |
| Stuart Weibel | Approve | |
| Andy Powell | Approve | |
| Makx Dekkers | Approve | |
| Leif Andresen | Approve | |
| Roland Schwaenzl | Approve | |
| Tom Baker | Approve | |
| Rebecca Guenther | Approve | This needs some revision to the definition. The term "continues" is essentially what's meant here, but these other terms are used (supplants, displaces) without being too clear. Please add "is continued or absorbed by", terms that are more understandable. |
| Eric Childress | Approve | |
| Stuart Sutton | Approve | |
| Sigfrid Lundberg | Approve | Seems almost to be a refinement of HasVersion |
| Erik Jul | Approve | |
| Rachel Heery | Approve | |
| Warwick Cathro | Approve | |
| Diann Rusch-Feja | Approve | |
| eric miller | Approve | |
| Shigeo Sugimoto | Approve |
3. Question: Qualifier for 'Relation': Requires
| Label: | Requires | |
| Name: | requires | |
| Definition: | The described resource requires the referenced resource, either physically or logically. | |
| Type: | Element Refinement |
type: single selection
| Answer | Points | |
| Approve | 21 | |
| Reject | 2 |
Abstain: 1
Choice with highest score: Approve
| Voter | Vote | Voter's comment |
| Simon Cox | Approve | |
| Renato Iannella | Approve | |
| Jon Mason | abstain | unfortunate use of "requires" in definition of "requires" |
| David Bearman | Approve | Despite what Jon says, the Label is a shorthand human readable form of the definition. Using the central term in the definition is not inherently bad practice |
| Priscilla Caplan | Approve | |
| Traugott Koch | Approve | |
| Juha Hakala | Approve | |
| Diane Hillmann | Approve | |
| Stuart Weibel | Approve | |
| Andy Powell | Approve | |
| Makx Dekkers | Approve | |
| Leif Andresen | Approve | |
| Roland Schwaenzl | Approve | |
| Tom Baker | Approve | |
| Rebecca Guenther | Reject | This is not the same type of relationship as the others. Does this just apply to software? The definition needs to be improved and examples added. |
| Eric Childress | Approve | |
| Stuart Sutton | Approve | |
| Sigfrid Lundberg | Approve | |
| Erik Jul | Approve | |
| Rachel Heery | Reject | Too specialised |
| Warwick Cathro | Approve | I am voting to Approve, although I think that the meaning of the definition is unclear. This qualifier has a use in applications such as government services where a document such as a licence requires another document (or licence) in order ot be valid. It is used in the AGLS (Australian Government Locator Service) standard. |
| Diann Rusch-Feja | Approve | |
| eric miller | Approve | |
| Shigeo Sugimoto | Approve |
4. Question: Qualifier for 'Relation': Is Part Of
| Label: | Is Part Of | |
| Name: | isPartOf | |
| Definition: | The described resource is a physical or logical part of the referenced resource. | |
| Type: | Element Refinement |
type: single selection
| Answer | Points | |
| Approve | 24 | |
| Reject | 0 |
Abstain: 0
Choice with highest score: Approve
| Voter | Vote | Voter's comment |
| Simon Cox | Approve | |
| Renato Iannella | Approve | |
| Jon Mason | Approve | |
| David Bearman | Approve | |
| Priscilla Caplan | Approve | |
| Traugott Koch | Approve | |
| Juha Hakala | Approve | |
| Diane Hillmann | Approve | |
| Stuart Weibel | Approve | |
| Andy Powell | Approve | |
| Makx Dekkers | Approve | |
| Leif Andresen | Approve | |
| Roland Schwaenzl | Approve | |
| Tom Baker | Approve | |
| Rebecca Guenther | Approve | |
| Eric Childress | Approve | |
| Stuart Sutton | Approve | |
| Sigfrid Lundberg | Approve | |
| Erik Jul | Approve | |
| Rachel Heery | Approve | |
| Warwick Cathro | Approve | |
| Diann Rusch-Feja | Approve | |
| eric miller | Approve | |
| Shigeo Sugimoto | Approve |
5. Question: Qualifier for 'Relation': References
| Label: | References | |
| Name: | references | |
| Definition: | The described resource references, cites, or otherwise points to the referenced resource. | |
| Type: | Element Refinement |
type: single selection
| Answer | Points | |
| Approve | 24 | |
| Reject | 0 |
Abstain: 0
Choice with highest score: Approve
| Voter | Vote | Voter's comment |
| Simon Cox | Approve | |
| Renato Iannella | Approve | |
| Jon Mason | Approve | |
| David Bearman | Approve | |
| Priscilla Caplan | Approve | |
| Traugott Koch | Approve | |
| Juha Hakala | Approve | |
| Diane Hillmann | Approve | |
| Stuart Weibel | Approve | |
| Andy Powell | Approve | |
| Makx Dekkers | Approve | |
| Leif Andresen | Approve | |
| Roland Schwaenzl | Approve | |
| Tom Baker | Approve | |
| Rebecca Guenther | Approve | |
| Eric Childress | Approve | |
| Stuart Sutton | Approve | |
| Sigfrid Lundberg | Approve | |
| Erik Jul | Approve | |
| Rachel Heery | Approve | |
| Warwick Cathro | Approve | |
| Diann Rusch-Feja | Approve | |
| eric miller | Approve | |
| Shigeo Sugimoto | Approve |
6. Question: Qualifier for 'Relation': Has Part
| Label: | Has Part | |
| Name: | hasPart | |
| Definition: | The described resource includes the referenced resource either physically or logically. | |
| Type: | Element Refinement |
type: single selection
| Answer | Points | |
| Approve | 24 | |
| Reject | 0 |
Abstain: 0
Choice with highest score: Approve
| Voter | Vote | Voter's comment |
| Simon Cox | Approve | |
| Renato Iannella | Approve | |
| Jon Mason | Approve | |
| David Bearman | Approve | |
| Priscilla Caplan | Approve | |
| Traugott Koch | Approve | |
| Juha Hakala | Approve | |
| Diane Hillmann | Approve | |
| Stuart Weibel | Approve | |
| Andy Powell | Approve | |
| Makx Dekkers | Approve | |
| Leif Andresen | Approve | |
| Roland Schwaenzl | Approve | |
| Tom Baker | Approve | |
| Rebecca Guenther | Approve | |
| Eric Childress | Approve | |
| Stuart Sutton | Approve | |
| Sigfrid Lundberg | Approve | |
| Erik Jul | Approve | |
| Rachel Heery | Approve | |
| Warwick Cathro | Approve | |
| Diann Rusch-Feja | Approve | |
| eric miller | Approve | |
| Shigeo Sugimoto | Approve |
7. Question: Qualifier for 'Relation': Has Version
| Label: | Has Version | |
| Name: | hasVersion | |
| Definition: | The described resource has a version, edition, or adaptation, namely, the referenced resource. | |
| Type: | Element Refinement |
type: single selection
| Answer | Points | |
| Approve | 21 | |
| Reject | 2 |
Abstain: 1
Choice with highest score: Approve
| Voter | Vote | Voter's comment |
| Simon Cox | Approve | |
| Renato Iannella | Approve | |
| Jon Mason | abstain | |
| David Bearman | Approve | |
| Priscilla Caplan | Approve | |
| Traugott Koch | Approve | |
| Juha Hakala | Approve | |
| Diane Hillmann | Approve | |
| Stuart Weibel | Approve | |
| Andy Powell | Approve | |
| Makx Dekkers | Approve | |
| Leif Andresen | Approve | |
| Roland Schwaenzl | Approve | |
| Tom Baker | Approve | |
| Rebecca Guenther | Reject | Need a clearer distinction between this and IsVersionOf. As with IsFormatOf/HasFormat, there must be a temporal quality here in that one would be preexisting. There is the same problem with maintenance here as with HasFormat, since the metadata would have to be continuously updated to reflect each version, edition, adaptation. IsOtherFormatOf (or IsFormatOf meaning another format) suffices. |
| Eric Childress | Approve | |
| Stuart Sutton | Approve | |
| Sigfrid Lundberg | Approve | |
| Erik Jul | Approve | |
| Rachel Heery | Reject | |
| Warwick Cathro | Approve | We need a default if we don't know which one is the primary (or earlier) version. Presumably the default will be HasVersion? |
| Diann Rusch-Feja | Approve | |
| eric miller | Approve | |
| Shigeo Sugimoto | Approve |
8. Question: Qualifier for 'Relation': Is Referenced By
| Label: | Is Referenced By | |
| Name: | isReferencedBy | |
| Definition: | The described resource is referenced, cited, or otherwise pointed to by the referenced resource. | |
| Type: | Element Refinement |
type: single selection
| Answer | Points | |
| Approve | 24 | |
| Reject | 0 |
Abstain: 0
Choice with highest score: Approve
| Voter | Vote | Voter's comment |
| Simon Cox | Approve | |
| Renato Iannella | Approve | |
| Jon Mason | Approve | |
| David Bearman | Approve | |
| Priscilla Caplan | Approve | |
| Traugott Koch | Approve | |
| Juha Hakala | Approve | |
| Diane Hillmann | Approve | |
| Stuart Weibel | Approve | |
| Andy Powell | Approve | |
| Makx Dekkers | Approve | |
| Leif Andresen | Approve | |
| Roland Schwaenzl | Approve | |
| Tom Baker | Approve | |
| Rebecca Guenther | Approve | |
| Eric Childress | Approve | |
| Stuart Sutton | Approve | |
| Sigfrid Lundberg | Approve | |
| Erik Jul | Approve | |
| Rachel Heery | Approve | |
| Warwick Cathro | Approve | |
| Diann Rusch-Feja | Approve | |
| eric miller | Approve | |
| Shigeo Sugimoto | Approve |
9. Question: Qualifier for 'Relation': Is Replaced By
| Label: | Is Replaced By | |
| Name: | isReplacedBy | |
| Definition: | The described resource is supplanted, displaced, or superceded by the referenced resource. | |
| Type: | Element Refinement |
type: single selection
| Answer | Points | |
| Approve | 24 | |
| Reject | 0 |
Abstain: 0
Choice with highest score: Approve
| Voter | Vote | Voter's comment |
| Simon Cox | Approve | |
| Renato Iannella | Approve | |
| Jon Mason | Approve | |
| David Bearman | Approve | |
| Priscilla Caplan | Approve | |
| Traugott Koch | Approve | |
| Juha Hakala | Approve | |
| Diane Hillmann | Approve | |
| Stuart Weibel | Approve | |
| Andy Powell | Approve | |
| Makx Dekkers | Approve | |
| Leif Andresen | Approve | |
| Roland Schwaenzl | Approve | |
| Tom Baker | Approve | |
| Rebecca Guenther | Approve | This needs some revision to the definition. The term "is continued by" is essentially what's meant here, but these other terms are used (supplanted, displaced) without being too clear. Please add "is continued or absorbed by", terms that are more understandable. |
| Eric Childress | Approve | |
| Stuart Sutton | Approve | |
| Sigfrid Lundberg | Approve | |
| Erik Jul | Approve | |
| Rachel Heery | Approve | |
| Warwick Cathro | Approve | |
| Diann Rusch-Feja | Approve | |
| eric miller | Approve | |
| Shigeo Sugimoto | Approve |
10. Question: Qualifier for 'Relation': Is Format Of
| Label: | Is Format Of | |
| Name: | isFormatOf | |
| Definition: | The described resource is essentially the same intellectual content of the pre-existing referenced resource and is presented in another format. | |
| Type: | Element Refinement |
type: single selection
| Answer | Points | |
| Approve | 23 | |
| Reject | 0 |
Abstain: 1
Choice with highest score: Approve
| Voter | Vote | Voter's comment |
| Simon Cox | Approve | |
| Renato Iannella | Approve | |
| Jon Mason | Approve | |
| David Bearman | Approve | |
| Priscilla Caplan | Approve | |
| Traugott Koch | Approve | |
| Juha Hakala | Approve | |
| Diane Hillmann | Approve | |
| Stuart Weibel | Approve | |
| Andy Powell | Approve | |
| Makx Dekkers | Approve | |
| Leif Andresen | Approve | |
| Roland Schwaenzl | Approve | |
| Tom Baker | Approve | |
| Rebecca Guenther | Approve | I approve the qualifier, but not the definition. The "pre-existing" should be removed and this qualifier should just be the same intellectual content of the reference resource that is presented in another format. |
| Eric Childress | Approve | |
| Stuart Sutton | Approve | |
| Sigfrid Lundberg | Approve | |
| Erik Jul | Approve | |
| Rachel Heery | Approve | |
| Warwick Cathro | Approve | I agree with Rebecca's comment. |
| Diann Rusch-Feja | Approve | |
| eric miller | Approve | |
| Shigeo Sugimoto | abstain | Difference between "Is Format Of" and "Has Format" is ambiguous. |
11. Question: Qualifier for 'Relation': Has Format
| Label: | Has Format | |
| Name: | hasFormat | |
| Definition: | The described resource pre-existed the referenced resource, which is essentially the same intellectual content presented in another format. | |
| Type: | Element Refinement |
type: single selection
| Answer | Points | |
| Approve | 19 | |
| Reject | 3 |
Abstain: 2
Choice with highest score: Approve
| Voter | Vote | Voter's comment |
| Simon Cox | Reject | What Rebecca says. Pre-existing is unnecessary here. The other stuff is managed with the "replaces" pair. |
| Renato Iannella | Approve | |
| Jon Mason | abstain | |
| David Bearman | Approve | |
| Priscilla Caplan | Approve | |
| Traugott Koch | Approve | |
| Juha Hakala | Approve | |
| Diane Hillmann | Approve | |
| Stuart Weibel | Approve | |
| Andy Powell | Approve | |
| Makx Dekkers | Approve | |
| Leif Andresen | Approve | |
| Roland Schwaenzl | Approve | |
| Tom Baker | Approve | |
| Rebecca Guenther | Reject | This is difficult to determine and not useful. How do you know which existed first, and what if an earlier format is reformatted? Then does is it no longer pre-existing? Maintenance of this is impossible because you would have to add to it continuously, considering how frequently a resource could be reformatted. IsOtherFormatOf is sufficient to show the relation of a different format. |
| Eric Childress | Approve | |
| Stuart Sutton | Approve | |
| Sigfrid Lundberg | Approve | |
| Erik Jul | Approve | |
| Rachel Heery | Reject | |
| Warwick Cathro | Approve | Again, we need a default if we don't know which resource is the primary one - presumably the default will be HasFormat? |
| Diann Rusch-Feja | Approve | |
| eric miller | Approve | |
| Shigeo Sugimoto | abstain | Difference between "Is Format Of" and "Has Format" is ambiguous. |
12. Question: Qualifier for 'Relation': Is Required By
| Label: | Is Required By | |
| Name: | isRequiredBy | |
| Definition: | The described resource is required by the referenced resource, either physically or logically. | |
| Type: | Element Refinement |
type: single selection
| Answer | Points | |
| Approve | 22 | |
| Reject | 2 |
Abstain: 0
Choice with highest score: Approve
| Voter | Vote | Voter's comment |
| Simon Cox | Approve | |
| Renato Iannella | Approve | |
| Jon Mason | Approve | |
| David Bearman | Approve | |
| Priscilla Caplan | Approve | |
| Traugott Koch | Approve | |
| Juha Hakala | Approve | |
| Diane Hillmann | Approve | |
| Stuart Weibel | Approve | |
| Andy Powell | Approve | |
| Makx Dekkers | Approve | |
| Leif Andresen | Approve | |
| Roland Schwaenzl | Approve | |
| Tom Baker | Approve | |
| Rebecca Guenther | Reject | It is not clear how this is used. Is it just for software? If so, a maintenance problem. Could we imagine that for example a record for ReadAudio really would tell all the programs that require it? If there are other examples, they need to be given because otherwise I cannot fathom how this would be used. |
| Eric Childress | Approve | |
| Stuart Sutton | Approve | |
| Sigfrid Lundberg | Approve | |
| Erik Jul | Approve | |
| Rachel Heery | Reject | |
| Warwick Cathro | Approve | |
| Diann Rusch-Feja | Approve | |
| eric miller | Approve | |
| Shigeo Sugimoto | Approve |
13. Question: Encoding Scheme for 'Relation': URI
| Label: | URI | |
| Name: | URI | |
| Definition: | A URI Uniform Resource Identifier | |
| Type: | Encoding Scheme | |
| See also: | http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt |
type: single selection
| Answer | Points | |
| Approve | 20 | |
| Reject | 2 |
Abstain: 2
Choice with highest score: Approve
| Voter | Vote | Voter's comment |
| Simon Cox | Approve | |
| Renato Iannella | Approve | |
| Jon Mason | Approve | |
| David Bearman | Approve | |
| Priscilla Caplan | Approve | |
| Traugott Koch | Approve | |
| Juha Hakala | Approve | |
| Diane Hillmann | Approve | |
| Stuart Weibel | Approve | |
| Andy Powell | Approve | |
| Makx Dekkers | Approve | |
| Leif Andresen | Approve | |
| Roland Schwaenzl | Approve | |
| Tom Baker | Approve | |
| Rebecca Guenther | Approve | |
| Eric Childress | Reject | Need specific coding scheme to be useful (handle, URL, etc.) |
| Stuart Sutton | Approve | |
| Sigfrid Lundberg | Approve | |
| Erik Jul | Approve | |
| Rachel Heery | abstain | |
| Warwick Cathro | Reject | URI is too vague to be a real encoding scheme. |
| Diann Rusch-Feja | abstain | |
| eric miller | Approve | |
| Shigeo Sugimoto | Approve |
Contact András Micsik if you have problems with voting.
| © MTA SZTAKI DSD |