Topic: Review of application profiles
Modified: 2004-03-22 09:41, Monday
Maintainer: Tom Baker
Latest version: http://dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2004/03/ISSUES/profiles/
See also: http://dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2004/03/ISSUES/
Shepherd: Tom Baker
SUMMARY
In principle, the Usage Board can review application profiles. There are two
sets of issues here:
1) Documentation of principles and process
The issue here is to clarify which documents are
being followed and whether the existing guidelines
are sufficiently clear to allow us to get started with
actually reviewing Application Profiles (e.g., at the
Shanghai meeting).
-- http://dublincore.org/usage/documents/process/#six
Section 6 of the Process document outlines the procedures by which
we can assign the status of "conforming" to application profiles.
-- http://dublincore.org/usage/documents/profiles
"DCMI Usage Board Review of Application Profiles"
This two-page document establishes that the Usage Board can review
Application Profiles.
-- http://dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2004/03/cwa14855-20040210.pdf
These CEN "Guidelines for Dublin Core Application Profiles", discussed
in another topic, could potentially function as format guidelines for
Application Profiles submitted to the Usage Board for review.
2) Actual Application Profiles in the pipeline
The issue here is to compile a list of application
profiles that are potentially candidates for review.
There are links in my notes but it would take awhile to
pull them together; what follows is just a start (please
submit additional pointers):
-- http://dublincore.org/documents/2002/09/24/library-application-profile/
Not sure if this is the latest version and whether the Working Group is
still in principle interested in a Usage Board review.
-- e-GMS v3 DRAFT for public consultation
http://www.govtalk.gov.uk/schemasstandards/metadata_document.asp?docnum=840
-- Public Broadcasting Metadata specification
http://www.utah.edu/cpbmetadata/PBCore/