innovation in metadata design, implementation & best practices
Topic: Encoding Scheme Types
See also: http://dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2005/05/washdc/
Modified: 2005-05-16 17:28, Monday
Maintainer: Tom Baker
For each of the currently recommended encoding schemes we
need to determine if it is a Syntax Encoding Scheme or a
Vocabulary Encoding Scheme.
In the DCMI Abstract Model, these are defined as follows:
Each resource may be a member of one or more classes.
Note that where the resource is a value, the class is
referred to as a vocabulary encoding scheme.
Syntax encoding schemes are also known as 'datatypes'
in some contexts.
In Washington, we need to decide on the following:
1) Whether we accept Andy's criteria for deciding on the
type of encoding scheme and his interpretation of the
existing encoding schemes in light of those criteria .
2) How a decision to declare these types should be reflected
in DCMI documentation. Specifically, the "Type of Term"
is currently shown in the Terms source data (which is used
to generate Web pages and RDF schemas) for each encoding
Do we want to change each of those into one of the following:
Which is used to generate:
Note that this change would trigger the creation of a new
historical version for each encoding scheme (but with no
consequences for term URIs).
3) Decide whether this difference needs to be further
emphasized in DCMI documentation -- e.g., by splitting
the section "Encoding Schemes" in the DCMI Terms document
into separate sections on "Syntax Encoding Schemes" and
"Vocabulary Encoding Schemes".