Version: Tue Mar 21 07:36:19 WEST 2006 Identifier: http://dublincore.org/usage/minutes/2006/2006-03-16.ub-telecon-report.html UB log: http://dublincore.org/usage/minutes/index.html Usage Board telecon - report 2006-03-16 Thu 1400 UTC (1500 Berlin, 0600 Seattle, 2300 Tokyo) Regrets: Andy, Stuart Present: Tom, Diane, Joe, Andrew, Akira Next UB Telecons (see also http://www.worldtimeserver.com/) 2006-03-23 Thu 1400 UTC = 1500 Berlin = 0600 Seattle = 2300 Tokyo 2006-03-30 Thu 1400 UTC = 1600 BERLIN = 0600 Seattle = 2300 Tokyo -- Finalizing the revised DCSV specifications (Tom) After the end of the comment period [1], everyone present on the call approves the post-comment-period changes made by Tom -- specifically, the three last paragraphs of the Introduction (starting with "As of 2006") and the entire Section 3 ("DCSV syntax encoding schemes") [2]. Unless Andy or Stuart have further comments, Tom will prepare the revised documents for publication and announcement with the April 10 Web build. This time, the revised specs will replace both the 2006 comment-period version and the 2000 legacy specs as documents with the status DCMI Recommendation. [1] http://dublincore.org/news/communications/public-comment.shtml [2] http://stage.dublincore.org/usageboard/2006/2006-02.dcsv/2006-04-10.dcmi-dcsv.shtml -- Changes to terms in the ELEMENTS1.1 namespace (Tom, Andy, Andrew) http://stage.dublincore.org/usageboard/2006/2006-01.definitions/term-changes/ The background for this issue is that documentation of any (and all) changes to the original fifteen elements needs to be done on a priority basis in order to prepare for a potential NISO review later this year. Andrew summarized what needs to be done with the document above: -- Confirms that the changes shown in the draft do indeed reflect the decisions made in Madrid. -- The proposed changes need to be justified. Each individual term needs to have a justification for the change proposed, even if this is just cut-and-paste from another term. Several sections marked (@@@@TODO) need to be filled in. An announcement giving overall context for the comment period and justification for the changes (especially regarding "content of the resource") needs to be finalized. ACTION 2006-03-16 Andrew: Wordsmith the justifications, also per element, with particular attention to "content of the resource". -- There has been discussion on the list about dc:language. In effect, the proposed change in wording (recommending that one follow RFC 3066 in using 2-letter codes when available) is at odds with the preference of many implementers for 3-letter codes. While this issue may require special attention on the list, Andrew would prefer to keep it part of the current batch of changes. Diane thinks that the crux of the issue is what "recommendation" means. Why does DCMI need to recommend one or the other? One way to handle this problem is to generalize the comment. From an interoperability point of view, the crucial point is that whichever way an implementer does it, an encoding scheme should be used. For example, in the comment to dc:coverage, we say simply: "Recommended best practice is to select a value from a controlled vocabulary..." ACTION 2006-03-16 Andrew: Suggest a comment for dc:language along these lines ("Use an encoding scheme...") and post to dc-usage for discussion. -- Replicating ELEMENTS1.1 term URIs in DCTERMS (Tom) -- Brief discussion. Diane sees a danger that people will think we're henceforth putting everything in DCTERMS. -- Diane proposes to use some Seattle meeting time for a very quick demo of the NSDL registry ACTION 2006-03-16 Diane: Post to dc-usage proposing a demo of NSDL registry for Seattle UB meeting - brief description, rationale for using meeting time, time required. 2009-01-29: Changed usageboard/log URIs to usage/minutes URIs.