Usage Board telecon - Wednesday 16 September 2009 - 1300 UTC

-- http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=05&day=20&year=2009&hour=13&min=00&sec=0&p1=0
   0600 Seattle - 0900 New York - 1400 London - 1500 Berlin - 2200 Tokyo - 2300 Canberra 

This agenda: http://dublincore.org/usage/minutes/2009/2009-09-16.dcub-telecon-agenda.html [*]

[*] = after next Web build (until then, available at dublincore.org:8080)

Expected: Tom Baker, Akira Miyazawa, Andrew Wilson, Julie Allinson, Stefanie Ruehle, Pete Johnston, Joe Tennis

Links
-- http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/dc-usage.html   - mailing list
-- http://dublincore.org/usageboardwiki/           - wiki

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Previous telecon

Report - http://dublincore.org/usage/minutes/2009/2009-09-02.dcub-telecon-report.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Review of Accessibility properties (Andrew)

    PROPOSED That Andrew's summary of 10 September 
    https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind0909&L=DC-USAGE&T=0&F=&S=&P=3704
    be sent as a response to the proposers of the "accessibility" property 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual face-to-face meeting

--  Date: Friday, 16 September 2009
    17:00-22:00 Seoul (09:00-14:00 UK)

--  Attendance
    Seoul: Tom, Joe, Akira, Stefanie, Andrew
    Remote: Pete, Julie

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda for Seoul meeting

--  http://dublincore.org:8080/usage/meetings/2009/10/seoul/
    Review of Usage Guide and related materials (Tom)

       Process:
           Sep 7-11: discuss on dc-usage the materials to be reviewed and get volunteers
                     proposed: assign two people to each text
       
           Sep 16:   last telecon before Seoul
                     reviewers will comment on how they intend to conduct review
                     (what questions to ask, what output to expect) 
       
           Oct 5:    one week before the start of DC-2009, reviewers should
                     post their reviews to the list for others to read
       
           Oct 16:   meeting in Seoul with remote participation from UK

    Administrative Components (Andrew)
    --  Task: Prepare a short review of ACore for discussion
        in Seoul.  What can or should the Usage Board say about
        ACore?  The review should discuss the possibility of
        defining ACore as an application profile.

    Errata and other changes to DCMI terms documentation (Akira)
    --  Task: Carefully check all of the proposed changes.
        Write a very short summary of the rationale for assigning
        a literal range to Title and Alternative title (using the 
        meeting notes above.

    Usage issues (Pete)
    --  Task: Follow dc-architecture discussion regarding
        DC creator and FOAF maker and summarize discussion to
        dc-usage by Friday, 2 October.  Prepare bullet points
        for discussing other issues (see above) in order to
        identify topics for further discussion in the Usage
        Board.  Propose a one-paragraph glossary entry for
        "Simple Dublin Core" for discussion.  Could Agent Roles
        be discussed in a short glossary entry?

    Using Dublin Core - Elements and Qualifiers (Stefanie)
    --  Task: In Seoul, we will not have time to discuss all of the 
        examples for elements and qualifiers in Using Dublin Core.
        Rather, the task here is to prepare bullet points on general
        issues related to the examples, for example the issue of
        literal versus non-literal values.  Prepare to discuss possible
        ways forward for Using Dublin Core: what would need to be done
        in order to bring the document up to date?  Is a document at
        this level needed, and what is its audience?

    Glossary (Joe)
    --  Task: Identify which of the terms in the old glossary
        are most important for describing the "Dublin Core style"
        of metadata.  For those most important terms, suggest bullet
        points for what a modern glossary entry should say.  Flag any
        obvious gaps -- DC terminology that would need to be covered
        in a glossary, such as the "candidate issues" above (and suggest
        bullet points).

    Frequently Asked Questions (Julie)
    --  Task: Identify which questions are still really
        frequently asked.  For those questions, prepare bullet points
        proposing current answers.  Propose an answer to the
        frequently asked question about the difference between
        dc:creator and dcterms:creator.

    Introduction to metadata (Tom?)
    --  Task: Tom would like to lead a discussion on various texts
        he has drafted about DCMI basic concepts.